首页 / 法律问答 / 关税对爱荷华州的影响是实实在在的。农产品出口受阻,农民收入减少,一些行业也面临成本上升的压力。总的来说,日子不好过。

关税对爱荷华州的影响是实实在在的。农产品出口受阻,农民收入减少,一些行业也面临成本上升的压力。总的来说,日子不好过。

商业律师 3 回答
好啊,爱荷华的伪基督徒、法西斯、种族主义者们,你们的报应来了。 为了那点鸡蛋和汽油出卖自己,现在你们卖的每一样东西都要遭殃了。鸡蛋已经涨了40%(之前是36%),这周盯着油价吧!各大对冲基金都在做空市场。 加拿大和墨西哥开始征收25%的报复性关税,爱荷华州的经济要遭重了,农业、制造业、能源、消费品,哪个都跑不了。 农业是重灾区。爱荷华州严重依赖农产品出口,加拿大和墨西哥是两大买家。关税一上来,需求肯定减少: * 猪肉和牛肉:墨西哥是美国猪肉的最大进口国,大部分来自爱荷华州。关税让爱荷华猪肉更贵,墨西哥人可能转头买欧洲或南美的,爱荷华农民要赔死了。 * 玉米和大豆:加拿大和墨西哥都进口爱荷华州的粮食喂牲口。现在关税一搞,他们肯定少买,爱荷华农民本来利润就薄,这下更难了。 * 乳制品:加拿大也可能限制从爱荷华州进口乳制品,本来牛奶价格就低,这下更雪上加霜。 * 乙醇:爱荷华州是乙醇生产大户,加拿大和墨西哥也是大买家。关税会让需求减少,玉米价格下跌,农民遭殃。如果他们转向巴西等其他国家,爱荷华州的乙醇产业可能长期萎缩。 制造业和供应链也完蛋。 * 农机设备(约翰迪尔):约翰迪尔在爱荷华州有工厂,依赖从北美进口钢铁和铝。美国的关税已经抬高了他们的成本,现在加拿大和墨西哥的关税又会减少他们的农机销量。 * 汽车和机械出口:爱荷华州也生产机械和汽车零件,出口到加拿大和墨西哥。关税一来,需求减少,可能要裁员或减产。 * 能源成本上升:爱荷华州的制造业和农业都依赖能源。加拿大是美国原油的主要供应国,贸易中断可能导致汽油和柴油价格上涨。农民用柴油开拖拉机,运输货物,成本都要增加。物流成本也会上涨,把爱荷华州的产品运到市场更贵了。 爱荷华州的物价和通货膨胀也要上天。 进口和出口都面临25%的关税,爱荷华州商品价格可能上涨: * 设备和车辆更贵(因为从加拿大/墨西哥进口的机械和钢铁要加关税)。 * 食品更贵,尤其是那些依赖北美原料或加工的产品。 * 能源成本上升,汽油、暖气、消费品运输都要涨价。 * 供应链中断,爱荷华州的家庭买日常用品更贵了。 贸易转向和其他长期后果。 * 永久性市场损失:如果加拿大和墨西哥转向其他供应商,即使以后取消关税,爱荷华州的生产商也很难夺回市场份额。 * 乙醇市场中断:如果墨西哥和加拿大从其他地方购买乙醇,爱荷华州在这个行业的地位可能会永久削弱。 * 投资不确定性:依赖出口的爱荷华州企业可能会暂停扩张、减少招聘或削减投资,因为他们担心贸易紧张局势会持续下去。 爱荷华州的政治和经济压力。 * 农民和制造商可能推动政策变化:爱荷华州的农业和制造业具有重要的政治影响力。当地的企业领导人和农民可能会加大对立法者的压力,要求他们谈判达成豁免或新的贸易协议。 * 对爱荷华州摇摆州地位的影响:由于爱荷华州是一个政治敏感的州,贸易紧张局势可能成为一个主要的竞选议题,影响地方和国家选举。 总而言之,爱荷华州要倒大霉了。报复性关税全面生效,爱荷华州面临双重打击——美国对进口商品征收关税导致成本上升,外国对出口商品征收关税导致销量下降。农业部门首当其冲,能源、制造业和消费者也深受其害。如果关税长期存在,爱荷华州的经济可能会出现失业、农业收入下降、能源成本上升和投资减少。 为了更便宜的鸡蛋和汽油,你们出卖了自己、出卖了社区、出卖了国家,现在鸡蛋和汽油都要涨疯了。 周末看到你们在Costco囤鸡蛋了。 你们知道报应要来了,但就是不承认。 再怎么祈祷、再怎么往功德箱里扔钱,也无法弥补你们的罪过。 这些罪孽不会被赦免,不会被原谅。 继续自欺欺人吧,等着在生活的方方面面陷入绝望吧。 祝你们今天愉快,好好享受你们的报应吧。 *补充:特朗普谈下来的那些协议,根本就没啥实际意义,没钱。那些“成果”人家本来就要做的。那特朗普到底在图啥?特朗普和MAGA们吹嘘的加拿大13亿美元边境计划,早在12月初就宣布了。干得漂亮,拜登!
回答次数 (3)
F
FloraNature
# 3
Traditionally, in the past, Iowa has been a bit sheltered from economic shocks. We haven't suffered the cost of living crisis in the same way the East and West Coast has. The 2008 financial crash hit us hard but not as hard as it did on the coasts.

This one is gonna fucking nail us. Jesus fucking Christ, why didn't the right listen? When us on the left kept saying, he's serious he means what he says he is going to do that shit....so many people called us doomsdayers and alarmist. Look, I'm not speculating, I'm taking Trump at his word. After J6 how the hell can anyone NOT take Trump seriously?

We told you he is gonna do the things he said he was gonna do for the last 2 years. And now he his making good on his promises. And so many people are shocked.

Goddamn it
r
ruix0113
# 2
You see talking like this to people is why the Democrats lost and we are stuck with this.

You beed to learn the difference between fascist soldiers living in a Totalitarian Regime and people voting for someone you dont like. Talking to them this way, labeling them as vile things they arent to make other people subconsciously think they should hate them because they are so and so is ridiculous. We aren’t post WW2 Germany, we arent WW2 Germany, and Democrats lost because morons wont stop calling anyone who does not support them all kinds of bad names.

Like who is going to vote for someone calling them a Nazi Fascist? Is it a form of coercion, thinking you will make people vote for you by saying they are Nazi’s for voting for someone else?

Your inappropriate off the cuff rhetoric is why we are in our current situation. Do better.
C
CuteGirl2
# 1
This is all in line with what many CEOs want, which is higher unemployment and costs. If the unemployment goes up we tje people become more beholden to their shitty jobs. We HAVE to work to keep a roof over our heads, food for our families and tje WONDERFUL /s insurance we all have.
Tim Gurner was saying they need more pain in the economy so tje rich can control the workers. Everything in the op post is all about gouging everyone but the rich. If all these things happen with the tariffs the rich will have more control again like they did in the last few recessions.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/09/13/tim-gurner-unemployment/%23:~:text%3DGovernment%2520data%2520put%2520Australia%27s%2520unemployment,of%2520course%2520not%252C%2520absolutely!%25E2%2580%259D&ved=2ahUKEwicq4j92KWLAxVKvokEHWPQKGkQgMkKegQIGhAE&usg=AOvVaw1Pb2f5CZHK8e3mzlfwJLP8
北美法律通