Thank you for the article. What am I missing from the article that would lend you to assert a statement of fact when the article itself does not include the contents of any emails that establishes he had businesses relations in Ukraine?
The contents of the emails were not released, only the volume count of them, as NARA claimed it would take more than 15 months to sort through them, The Federalist reported.
Why would a news story claiming that publications simply obtained emails through FARA as undeniable proof that Biden committed a crime?
If this is your standard of proof, would I be safe to assume that you believe is beyond a reasonable doubt guilty of the over 90 felonies he has allegedly committed considering we have eye witness testimony, contemporaneous notes, and communications that we can actually read?
If not, would you consider yourself to be objective in reviewing the allegations for Trump and Biden?