首页 / 法律问答 / 这篇文章描述了巴黎希尔顿的公关团队如何将她的偏见包装成时尚和魅力。他们巧妙地利用媒体的聚焦度,掩盖了她对弱势群体的歧视行为。文章揭示了名人如何借助公关技巧来粉饰自己的形象,同时凸显了名人背后存在的社会责任问题。总的来说,这是一个关于如何利用公关来掩盖偏见的案例分析。

这篇文章描述了巴黎希尔顿的公关团队如何将她的偏见包装成时尚和魅力。他们巧妙地利用媒体的聚焦度,掩盖了她对弱势群体的歧视行为。文章揭示了名人如何借助公关技巧来粉饰自己的形象,同时凸显了名人背后存在的社会责任问题。总的来说,这是一个关于如何利用公关来掩盖偏见的案例分析。

劳动就业律师 3 回答
Paris Hilton, once celebrated as the glamorous "it girl" of the early 2000s, has a troubling past. Beneath her polished public image, there are allegations of blatant racism, unapologetic homophobia, and repeated cruelty, all of which have been strategically buried by her PR team. In a 2017 interview, Hilton dismissed the women who accused Donald Trump of sexual harassment, suggesting they were seeking attention and money. She went on to victim-blame the accusers, claiming they targeted Trump because of his wealth and charm. Hilton's history of shocking bigotry is not just hearsay. In a notorious video, she sang a parody of "We Are Family" by Sister Sledge, replacing the lyrics with racial slurs and offensive language. This footage was quickly removed from the media's website, but the damage had been done. Additionally, Hilton has been caught on tape using the N-word casually and belittling gay men, calling them "disgusting" and claiming that "most of them probably have AIDS." Even her childhood friend, Brandon Davis, eventually cut ties with her over her repeated use of racial slurs. Hilton's cruelty extends beyond her treatment of people. In 2008, animal welfare groups investigated her treatment of pets, accusing her of using animals as accessories and neglecting their basic care. Despite the overwhelming evidence, Hilton and her PR team have repeatedly denied or minimized these incidents, claiming that people are making up stories to get attention. However, the accounts continue to pile up, corroborated by friends, journalists, and Hilton's own behavior caught on camera. Paris Hilton's story is a case study in how wealth and connections can sanitize even the most abhorrent behavior. Her glamorous persona masks a history of bigotry and cruelty, leaving one to wonder how much more her PR team continues to conceal.
回答次数 (3)
# 3
我得说,我确实为被重塑形象所蒙蔽而感到愚蠢。说实话,在她在2020年代重新崛起之前,我只是在一些杂志上偶尔关注她,是由于Y2K时期的复古情怀使我如此轻易地接受了"大家都错了,她其实很好很聪明,只是在愚弄所有人"这种说法。我之前并不了解这些内容,看到她公关团队费尽心力去掩盖这些信息让我震惊不已(至少有一个视频因为"违反YouTube准则"而被禁用,毫无疑问这又是公关团队在活动)。这确实令人作呕,你无法说她只是年轻无知,她说的那些歧视性的话语实在太令人作呕了,除非她真的相信这些,要么就是从中获得某种病态的快感。

一开始我确实感到失望,不过我猜我并不太感到惊讶。知道自己也会被那些致力于操纵名人公众形象的人所蒙骗,让我感到很惭愧。
# 2
我理解您对巴黎的看法。尽管她的法案主要关注研究,但它仍是联邦层面上第一个针对困扰青少年行业的法案。作为一个亲历者,我知道这些机构的残酷,即使最糟糕的情况下,它们十几年来仍在运营。

我不想贬低巴黎等知名受害者的努力,因为我们多年来一直努力让人们关注这个问题。与其将注意力集中在个人身上,不如集中在解决这个系统性问题上。我们应该团结一致,而不是互相攻击。
# 1
对于 2000 年代早期对巴黎·希尔顿的描述,将她称为 "It Girl"而不承认大多数人从一开始就对她有蔑视,我持谨慎态度。根据我的经验,被广泛认为是浮华、愚蠢和虚荣的象征的卡戴珊一家,在 2005 年受到的同情程度要远远高于当时的巴黎·希尔顿。

大家都知道她出名是因为她是一个有性录像带的继承人,当时性录像带的stigma要强得多。总是有人质疑"她难道不就是因为有钱才出名吗?"而在卡戴珊时代之前,这种概念比现在更令人不快。那时我不是布兰妮·斯皮尔斯的粉丝,但我尊重她的事业。我记得我被巴黎出现在杂志封面上而感到不满,因为她只不过是个糟糕的继承人。在我那个男性主导的工作场所,人们经常讨论巴黎是"不可操的",因为她不够性感,所以不可能成为一名女演员。

我记得并永远不会忘记她所有的偏执言论,如果有什么,这些言论使我怀疑与巴黎·希尔顿交往的人,就像人们鄙视任何与特朗普关系亲密的名人,因为我们对村民人乐队的成员的期望要高于特朗普。相比之下,林赛·罗韩的种族歧视言论让我失望,因为她确实很有才华,所以我对她有所期望。(蒂娜·菲也是如此)。但我从未期望过巴黎·希尔顿有什么decent行为。我赞同不给她任何平台,除了她反对青少年虐待营的倡导。但我们也不要夸大她在 2000 年代早期的受欢迎程度和同情度。
北美法律通